Annex 1
Evidence of Weakened World Bank Standards:
|
Forests OP/BP 4.36 (October 2002 draft) |
|
·
Lifts 1991 proscription on World Bank-funded logging in old-growth tropical
forests
|
|
·
No requirement of borrowers to secure forest peoples' tenurial rights
|
|
·
Inadequate safeguards for protecting the rights of forest peoples in
non-forestry projects
|
|
·
No clear provisions for participation in national level policy interventions
and PROFOR activities
|
|
·
does not apply to structural
adjustment and programmatic lending
|
|
|
| Involuntary Resettlement OP/BP
4.12 (adopted 2001) |
|
·
has less secure provisions to protect customary rights
|
|
·
permits resettlement of Indigenous Peoples even if this would have ‘significant
adverse impacts on their cultural survival’
|
|
·
has provisions which permit the curtailment of the traditional resource
rights of indigenous peoples in legally recognised national
parks and protected areas.
|
|
·
discriminatory treatment of people whose livelihoods are curtailed by
protected areas
|
|
·
questionable distinction between voluntary and involuntary resettlement
|
|
·
no requirement that standards of living or livelihoods are improved
|
|
·
not commensurate with standards IDB or World Commission on Dams (especially
no prior and informed consent for Indigenous Peoples)
|
|
|
| Indigenous Peoples OP/BP 4.10
(draft approved for consultation but process unclear and delayed)
|
|
·
first round comments by Indigenous Peoples have been substantially ignored
|
|
·
mandatory provision requiring that Borrower take special action to secure
indigenous rights to land has been replaced with vague language
asking Borrower to pay ‘particular attention’. Bank now offers
assistance to regularise tenure only ‘upon request from the
Borrower’
|
|
·
Indigenous Peoples Plan now only required when projects are pre-judged
to have adverse impacts
|
|
·
Previously required actions to address legal and institutional issues
again made subject to ‘request from borrowers’
|
|
·
Does not require protection of indigenous peoples’ intellectual property
rights and is inconsistent with international standards (cf.
art. 8j of CBD), which requires equitable benefit sharing
|
|
·
Inconsistent with international human rights of indigenous peoples
|