The Bambuti-Batwa and the Kahuzi-Biega National Park:
The Case of the Barhwa and Babuluko People
of the PNKB, Democratic Republic of Congo
Summary of case study presented at the CAURWA/FPP
conference: Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas in Africa: From Principles
to Practice
held in Kigali, Rwanda, September 2001
by Kapupu Diwa Mutimanwa Programme d'intégration et de développement
du Peuple Pygmée au Kivu
May 2001
This case study reviews the situation of the
Pygmies and the Kahuzi-Biega National Park, located in the East of the
Democratic Republic of Congo. The study reviews the historical background
to the park, the impacts of the establishment of the park, and makes
recommendations about its future management. This case study is based
upon evidence gained through interviews with many of the stakeholders
from the Pygmy community, the park and the government. The indigenous
Pygmies are recognised as the first and oldest inhabitants of this area.
Before outsiders came, the indigenous people had their own systems of
managing forests and wildlife, traditional methods were used to harvest,
and subsistence production was the sole priority, although a small amount
of trading was carried out with neighbouring populations in order to
secure alcohol, bananas and tubers. The park began in 1937 as a Zoological
and Forest reserve, and became the Kahuzi-Biega National Park (60,000
ha) in 1970 It was extended in 1975 by 540,000 ha by what is known as
the Itebero extension. At the time of its creation, in what is now the
park area there were a number of Pygmy villages. All of those who used
to live in these high villages are no longer there; some were driven
out in the 1960s, and others in the 1970s when the region became part
of the Kahuzi-Biega National Park. The managers of the park have never
involved the local population in the management of the park, contrary
to national law, nor compensated them for their losses, and the severe
access restrictions imposed by managers meant that the local population
were very hostile to the park. This net result has been ongoing disputes
between the local population and park managers, and this has contributed
to other factors (e.g. mining pressures, refugees, war) to promote the
destruction of park resources by outsiders and the local population.
There is a lack of understanding by park staff of the rights of indigenous
peoples, rooted in a lack of recognition of their special status, and
a lack of respect for their role in conserving the area prior to the
park. Virunga National Park, which covers an area of 800,000 square
kilometres, is facing similar problems. Local Pygmies have underlined
their willingness to cooperate with park managers in the future, but
only if park managers are willing to facilitate their participation
in its management.