Effective implementation
of the CBD
and support for the new paradigm on protected areas
by Tom Griffiths, Forest Peoples Programme
(Updated) December 2004
Article 10c:
Protect and encourage customary
use of biological resources in accordance with traditional cultural practices that
are compatible with conservation or sustainable use requirements
Securing biodiversity conservation through the
empowerment of indigenous peoples and local communities, requires
a rights-based approach to ecosystem management, environmental conservation
and community development. Without secure rights, full and effective
participation and tangible benefits, indigenous peoples and local
communities are inevitably marginalised by development and conservation
policies and programmes.
A new paradigm for protected areas
The recent consensus
of the World Parks Congress (WPC) held in Durban, South Africa,
resulted in the ‘Durban Accord’, which announces that the Congress accepts a ‘new paradigm’ for
protected areas under which protected area laws, policies, governance
and management are integrated
“...equitably with the interests of all affected people.” The Accord
celebrates the conservation successes of indigenous peoples. It
expresses concern at the lack of recognition, protection and respect
given to these efforts. It notes that the costs of protected areas
are often borne by local communities. It urges commitment to involve
Indigenous peoples in establishing and managing protected areas,
and ensure their participation in decision-making on a fair and
equitable basis in full respect of their human and social rights.
Opportunities to apply the new paradigm
The Convention on Biological
Diversity is a legally binding international treaty that frames
the way Parties to the Convention will achieve biodiversity conservation.
From its inception, and in numerous decisions of the Parties, the
CBD has established progressive norms and principles to deal with
the conservation of biodiversity in ways that address the equity,
participation and rights issues relating to Indigenous peoples,
local communities and other stakeholders (Articles 8j and 10c, among
others).
While special consideration
is rightly being given by the Convention to the implementation of
Article 8j, relatively little has been done to understand and implement
article 10c and few practical examples exist to guide national and
international policy makers (one important exception is the Secretariat’s
1997 document on Traditional Knowledge and Biological Diversity. UNEP/CBD/TKBD/1/2).
Ten reasons to promote Article 10c
Improved implementation of Article 10c will reinforce
achievement of the three main goals of the CBD: (i) the conservation
of biological diversity, (ii) the sustainable use of the components
of biodiversity, and (iii) equitable and fair sharing the benefits.
10c also provides an excellent vehicle for the practical implementation
of many the multiple progressive outcomes of the Fifth World Parks
Congress and decision on protected areas stemming form COPVII of
the CBD held in Kuala Lumpur in February 2004. Focused efforts to
implement 10c will support the new paradigm for protected areas
that promotes the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals
and recognition and respect for the rights of Indigenous peoples
and traditional communities.
In short, the CBD secretariat,
Parties, governments, other international fora and agencies dealing
with natural resource issues, indigenous peoples and local communities
should work to promote the practical implementation 10c because
it:
1.
Establishes an agreed framework for supporting Indigenous peoples
and local communities to conserve, sustainably manage and benefit
from their biological resources;
2.
Underpins many of the programme elements relating to equity, participation,
traditional knowledge and benefit sharing established under the
CBD’s expanded work programme on forest biological diversity (e.g.,
Element (1), Goal 4, objective 3, among others) and its proposed
work programme on protected areas (programme element on equity,
governance, participation and benefit sharing);
3.
Creates synergies for effective implementation of the work programme
on Article 8j (e.g., Element 3, Task 13, among others);
4.
Provides an opening under the CBD to recognize the diversity of
protected area governance approaches, such as Indigenous territories,
community conserved areas, sacred sites and other traditional conservation
areas (CBD programme of work on protected areas);
5.
Is fully consistent with the promotion of the full and effective
participation of Indigenous and local communities through the recognition,
promotion, use and application of traditional knowledge and traditional
resource management practices (CBD programme of work on protected
areas);
6.
Necessitates, as a precondition for its effective implementation,
reviews of national legislation and policies and their reforms to
account for and recognise, among others, Indigenous legal systems,
corresponding systems of governance and administration, land and
water rights and control over sacred and cultural sites (CBD programme
of work on protected areas);
7.
Promotes the sustainable use of biological resources thereby contributing
to poverty alleviation and food security among Indigenous peoples
and local communities (UN Millennium Development Goals);
8.
Could help strengthen co-ordination between the CBD and UNFF in
relation to IPF/IFF Proposals for Action on traditional knowledge,
participation and land tenure;
9.
Has the potential to empower Indigenous peoples (Chapter 26, Agenda 21) and local communities and help them
secure their rights to their territories and their environment;
10.
Is fundamental to the rationale of the ecosystem approach, which
recognises that: ‘...Indigenous peoples and other local communities
living on the land are important stakeholders and their rights and
interests should be recognised. Both cultural and biological diversity
are central components of the ecosystem approach...’ (Principle
1)
|