Sanema boy, Upper Erebato, South  Venezuela

home who we are what we do how to donate
latest news publications and reports links e-newsletter

Serious setbacks in IFC’s handling of complaints about its support for Wilmar

CAO admission of validity of NGO complaint regarding Wilmar ignored by IFC

Update: December 2008

FPP and 18 other NGOs, including local organisations in Indonesia, have been involved in a long-running process to get redress for the IFC’s persistent violations of its social and environmental policies in the palm oil sector in Indonesia. For over five years IFC has been providing financial support to the company Wilmar Trading / Wilmar International, one of the world’s largest palm oil dealers, directly and through various subsidiaries. In August 2007, FPP with other concerned NGOs and local organisations in Indonesia filed a complaint with the IFC Compliance Advisory Ombudsman (CAO) about this financing, alleging serious social and environmental problems in Wilmar’s operations, as well as violations of IFC’s own standards and procedures in making these credits and loans.

This has led to the CAO admitting the complaint. To resolve the problems, the CAO has mediated in an ongoing negotiation between Wilmar and two Wilmar-affected communities. The CAO has also accepted that there is a prima facie case that IFC staff did not properly apply the IFC's social and environmental policies in providing this support for Wilmar. The case is therefore subject to audit by the CAO. For details see:
http://www.forestpeoples.org/documents/ifi_igo/ifc_wilmar_update.shtml

Despite these findings, despite an ongoing dialogue between Wilmar and complainants, despite an ongoing audit of the IFC's prior dealings with Wilmar and despite the complainants writing further letters to the CAO and the Board of the IFC noting their concerns that IFC was contemplating a further loan to Wilmar, the IFC, in open defiance of the CAO, went ahead and provided a further loan to Wilmar on 23 October 2008.

At the same time the complainants have engaged in a follow-up correspondence with the CAO over the delays and content of a further CAO-negotiated dialogue meant to address the widespread and systemic abuses in Wilmar’s wider operations, which is also part of the original complaint. This update thus provides links to the relevant background information (most recent corresponce listed first):

Untitled Document