There is increasing concern from local, national and international civil society about the human rights implications of the EU’s €31 million Water Tower Protection and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Project (WaTER) that is focused on an area of Kenya with deeply troubling human rights issues.
In a letter to President Uhuru Kenyatta, the Sengwer call [on the President] to "stop the continued arrests and evictions of our Sengwer forest indigenous peoples from our ancestral lands (our community land) in Kaptirpai, Koropkwen and Kapkok glades in Embobut forest. We want our rights to live in, govern, manage and own our ancestral lands in the glades of Embobut forest recognized, secured, respected and protected in law, working hand in hand with state agencies to ensure effective and efficient conservation and protection of forests, water, wildlife and other natural resources therein".
How the National Constitution treats minorities is a good test of a nation’s maturity. How government applies their rules is a good test of the state’s maturity.
The Sengwer community at Embobut has been dispersed, with most still living in their forests and glades high in the Cherangany Hills despite the evictions by the Government’s Kenya Forest Service (KFS). There they hide from the forest guards’ harassment, from having their now makeshift and temporary homes burnt and basic household property destroyed, as well as from being threatened with arrest despite the existence of a High Court injunction forbidding such harassment and evictions.
La comunidad Sengwer de Embobut ha sido dispersada, aunque la mayoría sigue viviendo en sus bosques y claros de la parte alta de las colinas de Cherangany a pesar de los desalojos efectuados por el Gobierno a través del Servicio Forestal de Kenia (KFS por sus siglas en inglés). Allí se esconden del acoso de los guardias forestales, de la quema de sus casas, ahora improvisadas y provisionales, y de la destrucción propiedades básicas que forman parte de sus hogares, así como de la amenaza de ser arrestados a pesar de la existencia de una orden judicial del Tribunal Superior que prohíbe dicho acoso y dichos desalojos.
The lead article in the last FPP E-Newsletter focused on the superb progress the Ogiek of Chepkitale, Mount Elgon, Kenya, have made in their efforts to secure their forests and livelihoods by writing down their sustainability bylaws and embarking on the process of enforcing them. This process has resulted in their arresting charcoal burners, and the Kenya Forest Service (KFS) has now begun to restrict some of the charcoal burners’, as well as encroaching agriculturalist activities that were leading to the destruction of the indigenous forest.
El artículo principal del último E-Boletín del FPP se centró en el extraordinario progreso hecho por los Ogiek de Chepkitale, Monte Elgon, Kenia, en sus esfuerzos por asegurar sus bosques y sus medios de vida poniendo por escrito sus estatutos de sostenibilidad y embarcándose en un proceso para que sean respetados. Este proceso ha llevado al arresto de carboneros y el Servicio Forestal de Kenia (KFS por sus siglas en inglés) ha empezado a restringir la quema de carbón y las actividades agrícolas intrusivas que estaban llevando a la destrucción del bosque indígena.
The Kenyan government has sent Kenya Forest Service (KFS) guards, with police support, to Embobut Forest in the Cherangany Hills to forcibly and illegally evict thousands of Sengwer indigenous people from their ancestral forest lands and burn their homes and belongings to the ground.
We are deeply concerned by the forced evictions of the 6,000-7,000 Sengwer indigenous people and other communities in Embobut Forest in the Cherangany Hills (Elgeyo Marakwet County, Kenya).
For many years the Government has been trying to move the indigenous inhabitants of Embobut off their land by burning their homes. They have done this in the name of a fortress conservation approach which seeks to remove local people from their lands. As IUCN and all pre-eminent conservation organisations now acknowledge, such an approach only ever makes the environmental situation worse, and adds a human rights disaster to the environmental crisis. The new President has taken what at first appeared to be a new approach: he came in November and promised them a small amount of money to move, however now that it is clear people are refusing to move, this is being followed up with this threat of imminent eviction.