Forest Peoples Programme Supporting forest peoples’ rights

Forest Investment Programme (FIP)

Relevant resources

Syndicate content

Safeguards in REDD+ financing schemes

29 April, 2013

Among the many aspects of REDD+[i] under close scrutiny by indigenous peoples and civil society organisations, the issue of safeguards and their implementation is the one that continues to attract the most concern. This is particularly true now in the current debate on REDD+ and its degree of implementation and operationalisation. Since 2010, when the 16th Conference of the Parties of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change adopted its decision on REDD+ and related safeguards, a continuous process of elaborations, negotiations, and adjustments has taken place at various levels. The debate on safeguards has become both an opportunity for indigenous peoples and civil society to further enhance their calls for respect of internationally recognised rights and standards, and a leverage opportunity for donors to seek compliance for the use of funds transferred to REDD+ countries. As with other REDD+-related issues the safeguard debate has developed in a very complex manner, and has bifurcated into two streams. One stream is aimed at establishing norms and tools to prevent REDD+ from doing harm to the environment and forest peoples, the other is aimed at ensuring a proper assessment of potential benefits, known in technical jargon as a “do good” approach.

Read more

Indigenous peoples in Madre de Dios (Peru) call for greater accountability of forest and climate schemes, including the World Bank-IADB Forest Investment Programme (FIP), February 2013

25 February, 2013

Following AIDESEP's letter of 15th February to the Forest Investment Programme (FIP) mission, FENAMAD, an indigenous peoples' organisation in Madre de Dios, has released a statement calling for greater accountability of forest and climate schemes in Peru, including the Forest Investment Programme (FIP). 

Read more

Indigenous peoples of the Peruvian Amazon denounce failure of the World Bank’s Forest Investment Programme in Peru to respect their rights to lands and territories

18 February, 2013

On the eve of the latest visit of the Forest Investment Programme (FIP) to Peru (18 -20 February 2013), AIDESEP, the Peruvian national indigenous organisation, has sent a letter to the FIP mission denouncing the efforts of the Peruvian government to backtrack on previous commitments to recognise millions of hectares of untitled indigenous territories as part of their ‘Forest Investment Strategy’. 

Read more

FPP E-Newsletter February 2013 (PDF Version)

FPP

18 February, 2013

FPP E-Newsletter February 2013

Dear Friends,

Whenever someone remarks that a solution is being frustrated by ‘lack of political will’, I automatically ask myself: whose is the political will and what are the interests pushing for the opposite? 

Read more

World Bank Forest Investment Programme challenged to respect indigenous peoples' rights in Peru

23 August, 2012

Peruvian national indigenous peoples' organisation AIDESEP have written to the Forest Investment Programme expressing serious concerns that INDUFOR,  the team of consultants hired by the Peruvian government to develop a draft national investment plan, are still failing to address their key concerns and ensure their rights are safeguarded.

Read more

AIDESEP letter to FIP and FCPF highlighting their continued concerns with the National REDD strategy in Peru being financed by the World Bank

27 March, 2012

On the eve of the World Bank's Forest Investment Programme (FIP) joint mission to Peru and the meeting of the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) Partcipants Commitee in Asuncion (PC 11), the national Indigenous Amazonian peoples federation of Peru (AIDESEP) have sent a letter to the FIP and FCPF informing them of their serious concerns regarding the development of the FIP strategy for Peru and the broader national REDD strategy. Their concerns include the apparent lack of progress on addressing outstanding land tenure issues and regulation of pilot REDD projects. The letter also highlights procedural issues including the lack of participation of AIDESEP within the mission itself as well as the failure to circulate the Terms of Reference of the Mission four weeks beforehand as required by FIP operational guidelines. To read the letter in full (in Spanish) follow this link

Read more

9th RRI Dialogue on Forests, Governance and Climate Change, London, February 2011

18 February, 2011

The 9th RRI Dialogue on Forests, Governance and Climate Change, co-organized with Forest Peoples Programme, Tebtebba and Forest Trends, took place in London, UK on 8 February 2011. The Dialogue drew together a number of key actors involved in REDD, including representatives from Indigenous Peoples organizations, governments of UK Mexico and Norway, the banking sector, NGOs and researchers.

The consensus emerging from the discussion was that REDD should not proceed before clear safeguards are put in place. Gregory Barker, British minister of State, Department for Energy and Climate Change outlined that before REDD projects take place, it is crucial to assess drivers of deforestation, secure clarity of land tenure and ensure equitable benefit-sharing for Indigenous Peoples. To that end, he assured that the UK government will apply safeguards in bilateral REDD agreements with Indigenous Peoples and local communities. Despite this commitment he avoided mentioning whether the UK would push for stronger safeguards in the readiness processes of the World Bank’s FCPF initiative.

Read more