Skip to content

Protecting and Realising the Human Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant Peoples and Local Communities in the Context of Business and Human Rights

Translations available: Español Indonesio

Protecting and Realising the Human Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Afro-descendant peoples and Local Communities in the Context of Business and Human Rights is a new position paper co-authored by Indigenous, Afro-descendant, local community and civil society leaders who stand up daily against business harms to their human rights and the environment – harms connected to UK businesses and financial institutions.

The position paper brings together perspectives from diverse contexts (including the Wampís Nation (Peru), Liberia, Colombia and Indonesia. It articulates shared priorities and makes recommendations to the UK government.

 

It’s important that the UK protects and advances the rights of Indigenous peoples, Afro-descendent peoples and those of local communities. The UK should recognise their collective rights, adopt a corporate accountability law, and increase direct funding.

Norman Jiwan Indigenous activist, Human Rights and Environmental Defender

The recommendations include to: 

  • introduce a corporate accountability law in line with the key principles set out in the position paper,

  • fully recognise the collective human rights of Indigenous and Afro-descendant peoples, and local communities where applicable, and

  • ensure direct funding is channelled to the ground.

If these and other recommendations detailed in the position paper were implemented, they would be support an holistic, human rights-based approach across UK diplomacy, policies, laws, strategies and Official Development Assistance (ODA). Such an approach would equally contribute to fulfilling the UK’s international law obligations.

The position paper also serves as an invitation for UK policymakers and others to dialogue directly with Indigenous peoples, Afro-descendant peoples and local communities whose human rights are violated by business and finance. Direct dialogue is crucial to ensuring UK policy, laws and strategies achieve positive outcomes on the ground. 

 

The need for a new law in the UK

Corporate accountability is not just a safeguard against exploitation, it is the foundation for ethical business, equitable governance, and sustainable growth, ensuring profits do not come at the expense of people and the planet.

Mina Beyan, Program Director, Social Entrepreneurs for Sustainable Development

In this position paper, the co-authors highlight the commonalities between the types of human rights and environmental harms Indigenous peoples, Afro-descendant peoples and local communities experience. Drawing on their own experiences, and those of the communities they work with, the co-authors point out synergies in the barriers to achieving justice and remedy, and of holding business enterprises to account, across different contexts. 

The co-authors identify out a set of collectively determined key principles for a future UK corporate accountability law that ensures the protection and respect of their human rights. These principles, and the position paper as a whole, complement the sizeable body of literature on business and human rights. It supports calls by UK civil society for a corporate accountability law, referred to as the ‘Business, Human Rights and Environment Act’.

The UK government does not currently have a comprehensive regulatory framework on business and human rights. Earlier this year, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights highlighted its continued concern at this, and the limited access to remedy for non-nationals whose rights are violated by UK businesses. The Committee urged the UK government to address these concerns, especially for the most implicated sectors including financial and banking services, ‘as a matter of priority.’ 

It is crucial and urgent that a law, such as the one envisioned in this paper, is inclusive of those who are marginalised in these types of conversation and who are subjugated to extractive processes carried out in their territories. 

It’s fundamentally important that this law has this historical perspective, and it must also provide for compensation for damages, as well as political involvement in its construction, implementation and monitoring by Indigenous peoples, Afro-descendant peoples and local communities that have always been affected by agro-industry and other sectors.

Anonymous male Land and Human Rights Defender

The UK's obligation to recognise collective human rights

The position paper sets out the UK’s international human rights law obligations and explains why the collective human rights of Indigenous peoples, Afro-descendant peoples and (where applicable) local communities must be recognised by the UK government. 

Such collective rights are articulated in international human rights law. They include, amongst others, the right to land, territories and resources; the right to free, prior and informed consent; the right to self-determination; the right to self-governance; and the right to determine their own development. 

Though many states – including the UK - have recognised, ratified or endorsed relevant international instruments that include such rights, they often do not protect or respect these rights in practice, nor make it mandatory that businesses respect such rights. 

We call on all national and international governments to recognise our autonomy, self-determination and collective rights. We reject the oil, mining and logging companies, and demand their recognition for our autonomy, our self-government, our self-determination and our collective rights.

Pamuk Teófilo Kukush Pati, Gobierno Territorial Autónomo de la Nación Wampís

Why channelling funding directly to rights-holders is a good use of the UK’s Official Development Assistance (ODA)

Direct funding is inherently a human rights-based approach which supports self-determined, locally-led activities. To date, direct funding has on the whole been discussed in relation to international agreements on climate and nature. Flexible, direct funding can also be used to counter the myriad threats Indigenous peoples, Afro-descendant peoples and local communities face from businesses and their governments alike.

The position paper highlights the connection between corporate accountability and direct funding for Indigenous peoples, Afro-descendant peoples, and local communities. It sets out concrete examples of strategies and initiatives that Indigenous peoples, Afro-descendant peoples and local communities have put in place to enact self-determination – such as declaring autonomy, developing free, prior and informed consent protocols and various forms of community monitoring, including direct action territorial monitoring groups.

"The UK should increase direct funding to Indigenous Peoples, local communities, and Afro-descendant peoples to ensure that those most affected by corporate harm have the necessary resources to defend their rights" 

Mina Beyan, Program Director, Social Entrepreneurs for Sustainable Development


The collective positions contained in the position paper were developed and agreed by the co-authors during in-person consultations held in November 2024 with Peace Brigades International and Forest Peoples Programme.